Proof that SARS-CoV-2 was in the US earlier than previously thought


I. Research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)1 published on June 15, 2021, finds evidence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States earlier than previously thought.

1. Why did the NIH take so long to do this experiment, or maybe tell us? These antibody tests only take a few minutes to complete. The blood was drawn over 15 months ago.

2. Why is the NIH relying on these two antibodies in nine individuals as evidence of COVID infection, but won’t let a single American person use them as evidence of infection and previous immunity?

“A participant was considered seropositive if he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies on the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA and EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 ELISA in a sequential testing algorithm.

The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott and EUROIMMUNE ELISAs, as well as the net sensitivity and specificity of the sequential testing algorithm were estimated with 95% confidence intervals.2

3. The old excuse that we don’t know how long immunity lasts has been crushed by data from multiple studies. Unsurprisingly, one of Tony Fauci’s first emails said he expected the immunity to be long-lasting. But Americans have been told lies to push the vaccination program and keep people scared of COVID even after they have recovered and are immunized.

II. “The NIH report says the CDC’s testing guidelines at the start of the pandemic had a narrow focus: only people who had been in contact with someone confirmed to have an infection, or who had traveled to an area known to have the infection. transmission of the coronavirus, have been advised to be tested. “3

1. What the Washington Post does not clarify is that the test for COVID – the only test authorized for use by federal agencies – from January 1, 2020 until early March 2020, was grossly inaccurate. The CDC knew that. To cover it up, they only allowed a small number of people to get tested during this time, virtually limiting testing to those who already had a confirming clinical picture.

2. This cover-up by the CDC had dire consequences, perhaps intended. This gave the infection two months to spread across the United States and become established through community transmission.

3. By this time, contact tracing to control the epidemic had already become obsolete. There was far too much unidentified spread. Track and trace does not work when most infections are asymptomatic.

4. It is conceivable that the CDC will continue to claim that the vast majority of infections have symptoms in order to justify the many billions of dollars that pass through the CDC’s hands for the track and trace program,4 which is still active.

5. The program cannot work to control the pandemic at this late stage. The only objective of using the track and trace now is to obtain data on the social networks of the citizens.

III. Seven of the nine people whose blood tested positive for antibodies were black or Hispanic. Therefore, the authors are concerned about possible increased susceptibility in minority populations. Ah! Now we know why this story was dribbled now. To scare black and Hispanic Americans into vaccination.

* This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Office of the Director, and the National Cancer Institute.



Source Link

Please follow and like us: